Chiropractic Healthiness

Question:

Givem hell Tim! — DR. ROLAND HICKS Doctor of Chiropractic Certified Chiropractic Sports Practitioner Iligitimi non carborundum – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> DISCLAIMER.  I have not verified the factual nature of the following report. > Forwarded message: > Homeopath Smashes "Quackpot Menace" in California… > Opinion by "Consumer Advocate" Tim Bolen > Failed MD Stephen Barrett ran home to Pennsylvania last Friday > with his tail lodged FIRMLY between his legs (so to speak). > In probably his MOST HUMILIATING defeat to date, Barrett and his > toadies at the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) were > handed an unvarnished, unsophisticated kick in their privates > (again, so to speak) by a California Superior Court Judge who had > no sympathy, or appreciation, what-so-ever, for Barrett, et al’s, > claim to "expertise" in what makes up "quackery" in North > America. > It was a belly laugh to watch. > BARRETT’S GOT "THE HILL STREET BLUES?" > Hill Street, in downtown Los Angeles, is the location of the Los > Angeles County Main Superior Court.  And, I’ll bet Stephen > Barrett wishes, right now, he’d, not only, never heard of that > Superior Court, but had never even set foot in California at all. > California has not been good for arrogant Barrett and his band of > medical misfits he grandiosely self-labels as "the quackbusters." > THE LAUGHS GETS EVEN BETTER… > Wallace Sampson MD(?) showed up, trying to make it appear that > California’s Stanford University couldn’t function without his > presence on the staff – and that he, Wallace Sampson, was > Stanford’s "leading expert" on Alternative Medicine.  As that > "expert," Sampson tried to convince the Hill Street Judge that > "Homeopathy" was a fraud because he (Wallace Sampson) said so…. > Hah, ha, hah, heh, hee, hee, ho, ho, har, har, hargh, hargh, > (cough, cough)…   etc., etc…. > Sampson, who I first heard speak at a Federation of States > Medical Board (FSMB) meeting in San Diego in 1997, doesn’t come > across, to me, as convincing (to say the least).  In fact, I’d > characterize him as a "weasel," but I’m afraid the weasels would > sue me for defamation (and win)…  The first time I heard > Sampson speak was the incident that convinced me that "the > quackbusters" were a "looney-toons" operation.  Sampson’s > lectures on quackery give meaning to the word "pompous-ass-ity." > JUDGES ARE GOOD AT DECORUM… > I have to hand it to the Hill Street Judge.  He maintained a > straight face the whole time.  Not even a smile.  I guess Judges > see it all… > And, apparently this one DID SEE IT ALL, BECAUSE,  even before > the end of the case he declared Barrett’s, and the NCAHF’s > assertions about homeopathy as bald-faced bunk.  He stopped the > case – even before the "defense" presentation, and declared the > case as a NON-SUIT… > Insert laughter here… > THE REAL DEAL… > Delicensed MD Barrett,  running his "testifying business" out of > his basement in Allentown PA, through his questionable website > www.quackwatch.com,  had bragged (in a Texas newspaper article) > that he had "thirty lawsuits going on in California." > Does that means that Barrett’s cronies (and paymasters) are going > to be handed the pleasure(?) of watching "washed-up Stevie" > stumble through twenty-nine more NON-SUITS? > Barrett, right there on Hill Street, under oath, was forced to > admit that he was testifying for money… > It is not known, at this time,  whether the homeopath that so > soundly defeated Barrett, et al, in the Hill Street Courtroom > will file a "Malicious Prosecution" suit against Barrett, the > NCAHF, it’s board members, and members, etc… > Stay tuned…  the story just keeps getting better, and better, > and better… > Tim Bolen > JuriMed – Public Relations and Research Group

Response:

>DISCLAIMER.  I have not verified the factual nature of the following report.

The perhaps you should not forward it. I remind people of: >Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative,sci.environment >Hi All, >I made an error in judgement when I forwarded "Florida judge orders GRILLING >of >Quackbuster PERJURER(?)…" which was an opinion piece by Tim Bolen.  My >error was in posting an article which was disrespectful of various parties. >I normally try to treat everyone with respect, whether or not I am in >agreement

Mad – Quintessence of the Loon http://www.ratbags.com/loon Bad – The Millenium Project    http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Sad – Full Canvas Jacket       http://www.ratbags.com/ranters

Response:

DISCLAIMER.  I have not verified the factual nature of the following report. Forwarded message: Homeopath Smashes "Quackpot Menace" in California… Opinion by "Consumer Advocate" Tim Bolen Failed MD Stephen Barrett ran home to Pennsylvania last Friday with his tail lodged FIRMLY between his legs (so to speak). In probably his MOST HUMILIATING defeat to date, Barrett and his toadies at the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) were handed an unvarnished, unsophisticated kick in their privates (again, so to speak) by a California Superior Court Judge who had no sympathy, or appreciation, what-so-ever, for Barrett, et al’s, claim to "expertise" in what makes up "quackery" in North America. It was a belly laugh to watch. BARRETT’S GOT "THE HILL STREET BLUES?" Hill Street, in downtown Los Angeles, is the location of the Los Angeles County Main Superior Court.  And, I’ll bet Stephen Barrett wishes, right now, he’d, not only, never heard of that Superior Court, but had never even set foot in California at all. California has not been good for arrogant Barrett and his band of medical misfits he grandiosely self-labels as "the quackbusters." THE LAUGHS GETS EVEN BETTER… Wallace Sampson MD(?) showed up, trying to make it appear that California’s Stanford University couldn’t function without his presence on the staff – and that he, Wallace Sampson, was Stanford’s "leading expert" on Alternative Medicine.  As that "expert," Sampson tried to convince the Hill Street Judge that "Homeopathy" was a fraud because he (Wallace Sampson) said so…. Hah, ha, hah, heh, hee, hee, ho, ho, har, har, hargh, hargh, (cough, cough)…   etc., etc…. Sampson, who I first heard speak at a Federation of States Medical Board (FSMB) meeting in San Diego in 1997, doesn’t come across, to me, as convincing (to say the least).  In fact, I’d characterize him as a "weasel," but I’m afraid the weasels would sue me for defamation (and win)…  The first time I heard Sampson speak was the incident that convinced me that "the quackbusters" were a "looney-toons" operation.  Sampson’s lectures on quackery give meaning to the word "pompous-ass-ity." JUDGES ARE GOOD AT DECORUM… I have to hand it to the Hill Street Judge.  He maintained a straight face the whole time.  Not even a smile.  I guess Judges see it all… And, apparently this one DID SEE IT ALL, BECAUSE,  even before the end of the case he declared Barrett’s, and the NCAHF’s assertions about homeopathy as bald-faced bunk.  He stopped the case – even before the "defense" presentation, and declared the case as a NON-SUIT… Insert laughter here… THE REAL DEAL… Delicensed MD Barrett,  running his "testifying business" out of his basement in Allentown PA, through his questionable website www.quackwatch.com,  had bragged (in a Texas newspaper article) that he had "thirty lawsuits going on in California." Does that means that Barrett’s cronies (and paymasters) are going to be handed the pleasure(?) of watching "washed-up Stevie" stumble through twenty-nine more NON-SUITS? Barrett, right there on Hill Street, under oath, was forced to admit that he was testifying for money… It is not known, at this time,  whether the homeopath that so soundly defeated Barrett, et al, in the Hill Street Courtroom will file a "Malicious Prosecution" suit against Barrett, the NCAHF, it’s board members, and members, etc… Stay tuned…  the story just keeps getting better, and better, and better… Tim Bolen JuriMed – Public Relations and Research Group

Response:

>DISCLAIMER.  I have not verified the factual nature of the following report. >Forwarded message: >Homeopath Smashes "Quackpot Menace" in California… >Opinion by "Consumer Advocate" Tim Bolen

Well, Claire got at least one right — "consumer advocate" is in quotation marks.   — David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net      These are my opinions only, but they’re almost always correct.        "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants                   were standing on my shoulders."

Response: